Is judicial review undemocratic?

Perspectives on Politics 7 (4):897-915 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines Jeremy Waldron’s ‘core case’ against judicial review. Waldron’s arguments, it shows, exaggerate the importance of voting to our judgements about the legitimacy and democratic credentials of a society and its government. Moreover, Waldron is insufficiently sensitive to the ways that judicial review can provide a legitimate avenue of political activity for those seeking to rectify historic injustice. While judicial review is not necessary for democratic government, the paper concludes that Waldron is wrong to believe that it is a threat to democracy.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-25

Downloads
675 (#26,280)

6 months
95 (#53,953)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Annabelle Lever
SciencesPo, Paris

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references