Jehovah's Witnesses, Pregnancy, and Blood Transfusions: A Paradigm for the Autonomy Rights of All Pregnant Women

Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 27 (2):171-189 (1999)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1999.tb01449.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,136
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Obstetric Autonomy and Informed Consent.Jessica Flanigan - forthcoming - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-20.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
How Are Pregnant Women Vulnerable Research Participants?Verina Wild - 2012 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):82-104.
Policing Pregnancy: The Law and Ethics of Obstetric Conflict.Rodney Taylor - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 13 (1):38-38.
Jehovah's Witnesses-the Blood Transfusion Taboo.R. Singelenberg - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):138-138.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-31

Total downloads

10 ( #413,840 of 2,132,935 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #387,667 of 2,132,935 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums