Dissertation, Kingston University (2019)

Authors
Noa Levin
Kingston University
Abstract
This thesis argues for the significance of G.W Leibniz’s concepts of ‘expression’, ‘force’ and ‘perspective’ to the writings of Walter Benjamin and Gilles Deleuze. By triangulating the philosophical projects of Benjamin, Deleuze and Leibniz, as has not yet been done, the thesis opens up new perspectives and provides new readings of all three. Designating a structure of relations in which every simple substance or monad serves as a ‘living mirror’ of the universe, Leibniz’s concept of ‘expression’ denotes virtual inclusion or immanence. His concept of ‘force’ denotes the self-incurred drive that motivates the monad to action, while his ‘perspectivism’ defines the monads individuality through their infinite points of view on the world. Deleuze and Benjamin, I suggest, appropriate Leibniz’s concepts as part of their respective critiques of epistemology, which target Kant’s conception of experience as a hierarchic relation of representation, allowing them to redefine experience as non-hierarchal, de-centred and embodied. At the same time, for both, Leibniz’s philosophy serves to criticize historicist views of chronological time. Leibniz’s perspectivism is reformulated by Deleuze and Benjamin as part of their respective critical theories of the image, culminating in their later formulations of the ‘dialectical’ and ‘crystal’ image, respectively. The conclusion however, highlights the diverging paths formed by their returns to Leibniz. Benjamin develops a politically effective ‘historical perspectivism’ in which the discontinuity of history enables ‘true historical time’ to replace chronological time. Deleuze, on the other hand, opts for an ahistorical pure form of temporality, his ‘mannerist perspectivism’ describing a continuous, perpetually repeated ‘becoming’.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,274
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Meno. Plato & G. M. A. Grube - 1976 - Hackett Publishing.
Infinitesimals as an Issue of Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science.Thomas Mormann & Mikhail Katz - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (2):236-280.
Leibnizian Expression.Ch Swoyer - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1):65-99.
Specimen Dynamicum.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz - 1982 - Felix Meiner Verlag.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Events of Difference: The Fold in Between Deleuze’s Reading of Leibniz.Keith Robinson - 2003 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):141-164.
The Force That Is but Does Not Act: Ruyer, Leibniz and Deleuze.Ronald Bogue - 2017 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 11 (4):518-537.
Events of Difference: The Fold in Between Deleuze’s Reading of Leibniz.Keith Robinson - 2003 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):141-164.
Five Figures of Folding: Deleuze on Leibniz's Monadological Metaphysics.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1192-1213.
Leibniz, Mathematics and the Monad.Simon Duffy - 2010 - In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 89--111.
The Question of Deleuze’s Neo-Leibnizianism.Simon B. Duffy - 2012 - In Patricia Pisters & Rosi Braidotti (eds.), Down by Law: Revisiting Normativity with Deleuze. Bloomsbury Academic.
Deleuze y Leibniz en juego.Gonzalo Montenegro - 2015 - Cuadernos de Arte 20:40-49.
'By Leibniz's Law': Remarks on a Fallacy.By Benjamin Schnieder - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39–54.
Deleuze em Diálogo com Frémont: tentativas de ler leibniz.Gonzalo Montenegro - 2016 - Deleuze Em Diálogo Com Frémont Artigos / Articles Trans/Form/Ação, Marília (n. 2, Abr./Jun., 2016):p. 147-174.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-09-06

Total views
4 ( #1,244,734 of 2,448,633 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,192 of 2,448,633 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes