Journal of World Philosophies 2 (1):174-178 (2017)

Authors
Michael Levine
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
Mark Siderits, Michael Nylan and Martin Verhoeven were invited to respond to Michael Levine’s discussion paper ‘Does Comparative Philosophy Have a Fusion Future?’ This paper documents Levine’s reply to their responses.
Keywords comparative method  comparative philosophy  fusion philosophy  methodology
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/jourworlphil.2.1.13
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,700
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Response to Levine.Mark Siderits - 2016 - Journal of World Philosophies 1 (1):128-130.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Response to Levine.Mark Siderits - 2016 - Journal of World Philosophies 1 (1):128-130.
Comparative Philosophy and Cultural Patterns.Chenyang Li - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (4):533-546.
From Comparative to Fusion Philosophy.Elise Coquereau - 2016 - Journal of World Philosophies 1 (1):152-154.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-29

Total views
25 ( #425,679 of 2,432,313 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #214,406 of 2,432,313 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes