Journal of World Philosophies 2 (1):174-178 (2017)

Michael Levine
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Mark Siderits, Michael Nylan and Martin Verhoeven were invited to respond to Michael Levine’s discussion paper ‘Does Comparative Philosophy Have a Fusion Future?’ This paper documents Levine’s reply to their responses.
Keywords comparative method  comparative philosophy  fusion philosophy  methodology
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/jourworlphil.2.1.13
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,700
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Response to Levine.Mark Siderits - 2016 - Journal of World Philosophies 1 (1):128-130.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Response to Levine.Mark Siderits - 2016 - Journal of World Philosophies 1 (1):128-130.
Comparative Philosophy and Cultural Patterns.Chenyang Li - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (4):533-546.
From Comparative to Fusion Philosophy.Elise Coquereau - 2016 - Journal of World Philosophies 1 (1):152-154.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #425,679 of 2,432,313 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #214,406 of 2,432,313 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes