Response to commentators

Philosophical Psychology 36 (4):846-859 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper replies to the contributors to a symposium on the book Bad Beliefs. It groups the criticisms and concerns of the contributors under the headings “Gaps and Holes”, “Rationality”, “Epistemic Virtue”, “Agency and Control” and “Nudges”. It defends the view that bad belief formation and maintenance is very importantly rational, though it also acknowledges gaps, limitations and unanswered questions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bayesian Epistemology.Ellery Eells - 1994 - ProtoSociology 6:33-60.
Reasons and Theoretical Rationality.Clayton Littlejohn - 2018 - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Self-Fulfilling Beliefs: A Defence.Paul Silva - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (4):1012-1018.
Consensus and Evolution in Science.Gonzalo Munevar - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:120 - 129.
Cultural evolution and the variable phenotype.William Harms - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):357-375.
Evolution, Rationality, and Coherence Criteria.Andrea Polonioli - 2014 - Biological Theory 9 (3):309-317.
What are cultural attractors?Andrew Buskell - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (3):377-394.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-22

Downloads
22 (#688,104)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil Levy
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations