Reply to Fulda on animal rights

Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (1):111-112 (1993)
Fulda would solve the man-vs-animal problem by according animals rights of denumerable strength and men rights of nondenumerable strength. But the problem remains if there are sufficiently many animals and sufficiently few men in the universe. Fulda may have meant that human rights are (weakly) inaccessible and animal rights smaller. My objection to animal rights remains, and I note that even Peter Singer allows that the rights of slum children (but perhaps not others) may conflict with those of rats
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01082720
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
32 ( #164,642 of 2,191,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,783 of 2,191,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature