Should Children Have Equal Access to Neuroenhancements?

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (1):21-23 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Persuasive arguments have been put forward for the permissible use of neuroenhancements (Bostrom and Sanberg 2009; Dees 2008). It is argued that in the same way that adults are (and should be) free...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,335

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
22 (#819,194)

6 months
10 (#567,741)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ori Lev
Sapir College

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
School Choice and Social Justice.Harry Brighouse - 2002 - British Journal of Educational Studies 50 (3):402-403.
How Not to Be a Hypocrite: School Choice for the Morally Perplexed Parent.Adam Swift - 2005 - British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (2):213-215.
Better brains, better selves? The ethics of neuroenhancements.Richard H. Dees - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):371-395.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.

View all 6 references / Add more references