The Biophilia Hypothesis and Anthropocentric Environmentalism

Environmental Ethics 25 (3):227-246 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Much anthropocentric environmental argument is limited by a narrow conception of how humans can benefit from nature. E. O. Wilson defends a more robust anthropocentric environmentalism based on a broader understanding of these benefits. At the center of his argument is the biophilia hypothesis according to which humans have an evolutionarily crafted, aesthetic and spiritual affinity for nature. However,the “biophilia hypothesis” covers a variety of claims, some modest and some more extreme. Insofar as we have significant evidence for biophilia, it favors modest versions which do not support a particularly robust anthropocentric environmental ethic. A significantly more robust environmental ethic requires the most extreme version of the biophilia hypothesis, for which there is the least evidence.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The greening of white pride.Steven Gimbel - 2004 - Philosophy and Geography 7 (1):123-140.
Biophilia as an Environmental Virtue.David Clowney - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (5):999-1014.
The biophilia hypothesis.O. Gene Myers - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):327-330.
Anthropocentric Indirect Arguments for Environmental Protection.Kevin C. Elliott - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (3):243-260.
The Biophilia Hypothesis. [REVIEW]Andrew Johnson - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (2):187-188.
Beauty, Providence and the Biophilia Hypothesis.Mark Wynn - 1997 - Heythrop Journal 38 (3):283-299.
Beauty, providence and the biophilia hypothesis.Mark Wynn - 1997 - Heythrop Journal 38 (3):283–299.


Added to PP

23 (#501,879)

6 months
2 (#298,443)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?