Ethics and Education 6 (2):109-123 (2011)
The Dutch government has decided to intervene in parents? role in bringing up their children by imposing compulsory parenting support. As such an intervention has to be legitimatised as being ?in the interests of the child?, it is important to take a closer look at this concept. First it is shown that it is not evident that the government has the right to intervene in this way. Within the ?child?parents?government? triangle three protective shells of self-determination can be distinguished. One of these three shells protects the freedom of childrearing of the parents. Second, ?the interests of the child? are seen from a pedagogical perspective. This concept is explored within the framework of the so-called ?pedagogical relationship?, a core concept in the continental tradition of educational theory. It is shown that the pedagogical relationship is indeed completely ruled by the interests of the child. Third, the question is raised why the Dutch government is so eager to intervene in the parents? role given the fact that the UNICEF overview of child well-being shows that the Netherlands leads the world ranking and scores in the top 10 of all measured dimensions. These philosophical and empirical arguments are apparently not considered to be convincing. Hopefully, the decision of the Dutch government will be reconsidered seriously if the results of the interventions prove unsatisfactory in the coming years.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Child Abuse: Parental Rights and the Interests of the Child.David Archard - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):183-194.
The Terror of Explicitness: Philosophical Remarks on the Idea of a Parenting Contract.Stefan Ramaekers & Bert Lambeir - 2007 - Ethics and Education 2 (2):95-107.
Parents' Rights and Educational Provision.Roger Marples - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (1):23-39.
Parental Refusals of Medical Treatment: The Harm Principle as Threshold for State Intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
A Child's Expertise: Establishing Statutory Protection for Intersexed Children Who Reject Their Gender of Assignment.Emily A. Bishop - manuscript
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Choosing the “Good Enough” Child. [REVIEW]Helen Watt - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (1):51-60.
Parental Discretion and Children's Rights: Background and Implications for Medical Decision-Making.Ferdinand Schoeman - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):45-62.
Confronting Death in Legal Disputes About Treatment-Limitation in Children.Kristin Savell - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):363-377.
Genetic Enhancement and Parental Obligation.Larry A. Herzberg - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):98-111.
Birth Registration: An Essential First Step Toward Ensuring the Rights of All Children.Jonathan Todres - manuscript
Child Rearing in the “Risk” Society: On the Discourse of Rights and the “Best Interests of a Child”.Paul Smeyers - 2010 - Educational Theory 60 (3):271-284.
Children's Agency, Children's Welfare: A Dialogical Approach to Child Development, Policy and Practice.Carol van Nijnatten - 2010 - Policy Press.
A Goodness-of-Fit Approach to Informed Consent for Pediatric Intervention Research.Jessica Masty & Celia Fisher - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):139 – 160.
Added to index2011-12-09
Total downloads7 ( #521,263 of 2,163,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?