The Limits of Critical Thinking

Informal Logic 14 (2) (1992)

Authors
Don Levi
University of Oregon
Abstract
This paper examines Robert Fogelin's suggestion that there may be deep disagreements, where no argument can address what is at issue. A number of possible bases for Fogelin's position are considered and rejected: people sometimes do not have enough in common for reasons to count as reasons; doubt is possible only against the background of framework propositions; key premises may be inarguable; argument must occur within a conceptual framework. The paper concludes by reflecting on why it is important to have a point of view when thinking critically about an argument and whether that fact constitutes a limitation as to what can be achieved by critical thinking
Keywords Deep disagreement, critical thinking, argumentative exchange, point of view, framework propositions, inarguability, conceptual framework, rule-governed activity, what is at issue, issue raised by argument, participant
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,481
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Understanding the Abortion Argument.Roger Wertheimer - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):67-95.
The Logic of Deep Disagreements.Robert Fogelin - 1985 - Informal Logic 7 (1):3-11.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Critical is the Dialectical Tier?Qingyin Liang & Yun Xie - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):229-242.
Thinking Critically as an Examination of Thoughts.Kanit Sirichan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 37:259-266.
Critical Thinking.Robert Ennis - 1991 - Teaching Philosophy 14 (1):4-18.
Learning, Critical Thinking, and Confucius.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:79-84.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
50 ( #158,222 of 2,248,507 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #38,600 of 2,248,507 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature