Journal of Business Ethics 124 (2):1-18 (2014)

Authors
Michael P. Levine
University of Western Australia
Jacqueline Boaks
Curtin University, Western Australia
Abstract
Accounts of leadership in relation to ethics can and do go wrong in several ways that may lead us too quickly into thinking there is a tighter relationship between ethics and leadership than we have reason to believe. Firstly, these accounts can be misled by the centrality of values talk in recent discussions of leadership into thinking that values of a particular kind are sufficient for leadership. Secondly, the focus on character in recent leadership accounts can lead to a similar error. The assumption here is that because good character is often a locus of descriptions of leaders, such character is necessary and sufficient for leadership. Thirdly, we can fall victim to an observer bias that colors our accounts of the leaders we admire and thus wish to either have or be, which in turn leads to the fourth way in which accounts of leadership can go wrong in their description of the role of ethics in leadership. Through inattention or through wishful thinking accounts of leadership can become merely prescriptive and stipulate that ethics is requisite and at least partly constitutive of leadership. Keeping in mind these ways in which accounts of leadership commonly go astray, we can say that any adequate account of leadership must, at least in the first instance, be able to differentiate not only between leadership and good ethical character, but also between leadership and power, authority, influence, managerial ability, and charisma. Taking a closer look at some of the ways that the relation between leadership and ethics is misconstrued is necessary to better understanding both leadership and its connection to ethics. It is, however, just a first step. Asking whether we have reason to think of leadership as an Aristotelian virtue should, we think, enable us to give a more accurate and useful account of the complexity of the relation. It also captures underlying reasons for wanting to see the two as intrinsically connected
Keywords Leadership  Virtue  Ethics  Machiavelli  Aristotle
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1807-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,408
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Virtue Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Virtue Theory and Abortion.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (3):223-246.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leadership Ethics: Mapping the Territory.Joanne B. Ciulla - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (1):5-28.
Responsible Leadership as Virtuous Leadership.Kim Cameron - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (S1):25-35.
Moral Leadership: An Overview. [REVIEW]Al Gini - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):323-330.
Leadership.Ph D. Joseph C. Rost - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (1):129-142.
Some Perspectives of Managerial Ethical Leadership.Georges Enderle - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (8):657 - 663.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-12

Total views
66 ( #153,503 of 2,420,816 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,362 of 2,420,816 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes