Michael Walzer has made great contributions to the appreciation of both moral and cultural pluralism in political theory. Nonetheless, there are ways in which Walzer's arguments appear anti-pluralistic. The question of this essay is: why is there so little pluralism in Walzer's political theory, or why does its pluralism run out so soon? Focusing on Spheres of Justice and Nation and Universe, it examines the effect of Walzer's nationalism/statism on his theory, and the constraints his theory faces in considering multiculturalism or political pluralist regimes such as federalism within a state.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
From Pluralist to Patriotic Politics: Putting Practice First.Charles Blattberg - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
In Defence of Pure Pluralism: Two Readings of Walzer's Spheres of Justice.Margo Trappenburg - 2000 - Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (3):343–362.
Categorizing Groups, Categorizing States: Theorizing Minority Rights in a World of Deep Diversity.Will Kymlicka - 2009 - Ethics and International Affairs 23 (4):371-388.
Descriptive and Normative Aspects of the Theory of Legal Pluralism : Illustrated by Problems of Media Regulation.Astrid Link - unknown
Impartiality in Context: Grounding Justice in a Pluralist World.Shane O'Neill - 1997 - State University of New York Press.
The Political Philosophy of Walzer's Social Criticism.J. Gregory - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1093-1111.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #134,821 of 2,164,293 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,554 of 2,164,293 )
How can I increase my downloads?