Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):177 - 185 (2005)

Abstract
Building on influential work in virtue ethics, this collection of essays examines the categories of self, person, and anthropology as foci for comparative analysis. The papers unite reflections on theory and method with descriptive work that addresses thinkers from the modern West, Christian and Jewish Late Antiquity, early China, and other settings. The introduction sets out central methodological issues that are subsequently taken up in each essay, including the origin of the categories through which comparison proceeds, the status of these categories in the process of comparison, and the goals of comparison. In considering the question of goals, the introduction draws connections between comparative study and historical study within one tradition. Both types of analysis can bridge the gap between historical and normative work by attending to the ways in which the questions a scholar asks - not just the answers found - vary from one context to another
Keywords Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethics   virtue   self   anthropology   Geistesgeschichte   history of ethics   comparative ethi
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00197.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Confucianism, Democracy, and the Virtue of Deference.Aaron Stalnaker - 2013 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (4):441-459.
The Rhetoric Of Context.Jung H. Lee - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (4):555-584.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Virtues in Xunzi's Thought.Jonathan W. Schofer - 1993 - Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1):117 - 136.
Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison.Aaron Stalnaker - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
The Construction of Ontological Categories.Jan Westerhoff - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):595 – 620.
Accessible Categories, Saturation and Categoricity.Jiří Rosický - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (3):891-901.
Categories and Comparisons of Artworks.H. J. Pratt - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):45-59.
Chasing Aristotle’s Categories Down the Tree of Grammar.Michael R. Baumer - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:341-449.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-30

Total views
10 ( #900,275 of 2,508,150 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,711 of 2,508,150 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes