Abstract
Dialectical approaches traditionally conceptualize argumentation as a discussion in which two parties debate on “two sides of an issue”. However, many political issues engender multiple positions. This is clear in multi-party online deliberations in which often an array of competing positions is debated in one and the same discussion. A proponent of a given position thus addresses a number of possible opponents, who in turn may hold incompatible opinions. The goal of this paper is to shed extra light on such “polylogical” clash of opinions in online deliberation, by examining the multi-layered participation in actual online debates. The examples are drawn from the readers’ discussions on Osama bin Laden’s killing in online versions of two British newspapers: The Guardian and The Telegraph. As a result of the analysis, a distinction between sides, positions, and cases in argumentative deliberation is proposed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1075/jaic.2.1.07lew
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Argumentative Polylogues: Beyond Dialectical Understanding of Fallacies.Marcin Lewiński - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):193-218.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Participation and Parties: The Positions of Party Congress Delegates.Francesco Raniolo - 2011 - Polis: Research and studies on Italian society and politics 25 (2):235-262.
Worldwide Deliberation and Public Use of Reason Online.May Thorseth - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):243-252.
Policy and Party Competition in Japan After the Election of 2000.Junko Kato & Michael Laver - 2003 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 4 (1):121-133.
Form and Emptiness: Aquinas and Nagarjuna.Paul O'Grady - 2005 - Contemporary Buddhism 6 (2):173-188.
The Text-Performance Relation in Theater.James Hamilton - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (4):614-629.
Studies in Scientific Realism.André Kukla - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Before the Law.Russell A. Berman - 2012 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2012 (160):3-7.
Estimating Party Policy Positions: Japan in Comparative Context.Michael Laver & Kenneth Benoit - 2005 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 6 (2):187-209.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-15

Total views
15 ( #671,644 of 2,445,030 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,445,030 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes