Reply to Papineau and durà-vilà

Analysis 69 (1):86-89 (2009)
Peter J. Lewis
Dartmouth College
I argued that anyone who adopts the Everettian approach to the foundations of quantum mechanics must also accept the (unpopular) ‘halfer’ solution to the Sleeping Beauty puzzle. Papineau and Durà-Vilà have responded with an argument that it is perfectly cogent both to be an Everettian and to accept the (popular) ‘thirder’ solution to Sleeping Beauty. Here I attempt to rebut their argument, and to clarify my original position.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1093/analys/ann013
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 36,596
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Everett and Structure.David Wallace - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):87-105.
Quantum Sleeping Beauty.Peter J. Lewis - 2006 - Analysis 67 (1):59-65.
Quantum Sleeping Beauty.Peter J. Lewis - 2006 - Analysis 67 (1):59-65.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Confirmation in a Branching World: The Everett Interpretation and Sleeping Beauty.Darren Bradley - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (2):323-342.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
44 ( #149,164 of 2,303,812 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #274,008 of 2,303,812 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature