Philosophy of Science 76 (3):355-371 (2009)
What, if anything, is wrong with typological thinking? The question is important, for some evolutionary developmental biologists appear to espouse a form of typology. I isolate four allegations that have been brought against it. They include the claim that typological thinking is mystical; the claim that typological thinking is at odds with the fact of evolution; the claim that typological thinking is committed to an objectionable metaphysical view, which Elliott Sober calls the ‘natural state model’; and finally the view (endorsed by Ron Amundson and Günter Wagner) that typological thinking—and specifically evolutionary developmental biology’s typological thinking—is committed to a peculiar form of causation that does not fit neatly into the causal models endorsed by population genetics. I argue that, properly understood, the typological thinking of evolutionary developmental biology does not run into any of these problems. *Received April 2008; revised August 2009. †To contact the author, please write to: Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, CB2 3RH Cambridge, United Kingdom; e‐mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Species, Essence and Explanation.Tim Lewens - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (4):751-757.
Functionalism and Structuralism as Philosophical Stances: Van Fraassen Meets the Philosophy of Biology.Sandy C. Boucher - 2015 - Biology and Philosophy 30 (3):383-403.
Grene and Hull on Types and Typological Thinking in Biology.Phillip Honenberger - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 50:13-25.
Ancestor of the New Archetypal Biology: Goethe’s Dynamic Typology as a Model for Contemporary Evolutionary Developmental Biology.Mark F. Riegner - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):735-744.
Similar books and articles
“And Then a Miracle Occurs” — Weak Links in the Chain of Argument From Punctuation to Hierarchy.Davida E. Kellogg - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (1):3-28.
Nomological and Typological Sciences.Wladyslaw Tatarkiewicz - 1960 - Journal of Philosophy 57 (7):234-240.
Chapter X Case Syncretism in German Feminines: Typological, Functional and Structural Aspects.Manfred Krifka - manuscript
Typological Thinking, Statistical Significance, and the Methodological Divergence of Experimental Psychology and Economics.Charles F. Blaich & Humberto Barreto - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):405-405.
Racism and Human Genome Diversity Research: The Ethical Limits of "Population Thinking".Lisa Gannett - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S479-.
The Normal Genome in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary Thought.L. Gannett - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (1):143-185.
Typology Reconsidered: Two Doctrines on the History of Evolutionary Biology. [REVIEW]Ron Amundson - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (2):153-177.
Typology Reconfigured: From the Metaphysics of Essentialism to the Epistemology of Representation.Alan Love - 2009 - Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):51-75.
On the Origin of the Typological/Population Distinction in Ernst Mayr's Changing Views of Species, 1942-1959.Carl Chung - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):277-296.
Added to index2010-01-09
Total downloads100 ( #50,694 of 2,169,366 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,284 of 2,169,366 )
How can I increase my downloads?