Philosophy of Management 8 (3):81-96 (2009)
Abstract‘Stakeholder’ and related notions have been coined to enhance managerial practice in mainstream corporations. Currently, these notions are abundantly present in all kinds of discourses, especially those on ‘socially responsible investing’. But what kind of stakeholder management are these socially responsible investors promoting and what might be reasonable expectations about outcomes? We find that they promote an approach that has shareholder value as motivation and legitimisation and that they nowhere promote sharing of governance with stakeholders other than shareholders. We explain why this might reasonably be expected. Besides mainstream investors and corporations, investing through co-operatively structured corporations differs regarding stakeholder positions with respect to the position of at least one stakeholder group, whether this be consumers, employees or producers. What are the implications thereof and are these investments then superior from a socially responsible perspective on investment? We find that co-operative investors meet their own set of difficulties in implementing stakeholder management. Our questions and findings enable us to formulate some critical remarks on the stakeholder-notion in both discourses and in general. We suggest that its use, if not halted altogether, should at least be restricted and substituted by the use of more specific notions
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Stakeholder Duties: On the Moral Responsibility of Corporate Investors. [REVIEW]Martin E. Sandbu - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):97-107.
Similar books and articles
Understanding Socially Responsible Investing: The Effect of Decision Frames and Trade-Off Options. [REVIEW]Katherina Glac - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):41 - 55.
A Comparison of Socially Responsible and Conventional Investors.Jonathan McLachlan & John Gardner - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):11-25.
Non-Governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism, and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications. [REVIEW]Terrence Guay, Jonathan P. Doh & Graham Sinclair - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):125-139.
Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy.Adele Santana - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
God as a Managerial Stakeholder?Mark S. Schwartz - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2/3):291 - 306.
The Ethics of Investing: Making Money or Making a Difference?Joakim Sandberg - 2008 - Dissertation, University of Gothenburg
A Dynamic Model of Stakeholder Management.Michael E. Johnson-Cramer & Shawn Berman - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:320-325.
Stakeholder Voice: A Problem, a Solution and a Challenge for Managers and Academics.Harry J. van Buren Iii & Michelle Greenwood - 2009 - Philosophy of Management 8 (3):15-23.
Making a Difference or Making a Statement? Finance Research and Socially Responsible Investment.Pietra Rivoli - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (3):271-287.
That's Not What Happened and It's Not My Fault Anyway! An Exploration of Management Attitudes Towards Sri-Shareholder Engagement.Wim Vandekerckhove, Jos Leys & Dirk Van Braeckel - 2007 - Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (4):403–418.