European Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):1064-1081 (2015)

Toleration and respect are types of relations between different agents. The standard analyses of toleration and respect are attitudinal; toleration and respect require subjects to have appropriate types of attitudes towards the objects of toleration or respect. The paper investigates whether states can sensibly be described as tolerant or respectful in ways theoretically relevantly similar to the standard analyses. This is a descriptive question about the applicability of concepts rather than a normative question about whether, when and why states should be tolerant or respectful. The problem of institutional application is that institutions in general and the state in particular arguably cannot have attitudes of the required kind. This problem is distinct from, and broader than, well-known problems about whether political toleration is normatively legitimate. To make sense of political toleration or respect, the paper proposes that the analysis of institutional toleration and respect should not be solely agent-centred or patient-centred. The analysis should also include features about the relation itself. We can describe institutions as tolerant or respectful in a sense relevantly similar to the standard analyses if we focus on the public features of the relation between institutions and citizens or groups, without ascribing attitudes in the problematic sense
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/ejop.12027
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Value, Respect, and Attachment.Joseph Raz - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Human Dignity as High Moral Status.Manuel Toscano - 2011 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 6 (2):4-25.
Toleration and Groups.Peter Balint - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 17 (3):375-384.
Rescuing Toleration.Anna Elisabetta Galeotti - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-21.
Rescuing Toleration.Anna Elisabetta Galeotti - 2021 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24 (1):87-107.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Toleration, Reason, and Virtue.Hahn Hsu - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:257-268.
Toleration and Respect: Historical Instances and Current Problems.Maxim Khomyakov - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (3):223-239.
What Toleration Is.Andrew Jason Cohen - 2004 - Ethics 115 (1):68-95.
On Toleration.Susan Mendus & David Edwards (eds.) - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
The Conditions of Tolerance.Ryan Muldoon, Michael Borgida & Michael Cuffaro - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):322-344.
Toleration and Cultural Controversies.Andrew Shorten - 2005 - Res Publica 11 (3):275-299.
Toleration, Children and Education.Colin Macleod - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):9-21.


Added to PP index

Total views
55 ( #208,325 of 2,519,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,332 of 2,519,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes