Journal of Global Ethics 12 (3):269-278 (2016)

Many contributions to the philosophical debate about conceptual and normative issues raised by the refugee crisis fail to take properly account of the difference between ideal and nonideal theory. This makes several otherwise interesting and apparently plausible contributions to the philosophy of the refugee crisis problematic. They are problematic in the sense that they mix up ideal and nonideal aspirations and assumptions in an incoherent way undermining the proposed views. Two examples of this problem are discussed. The first example is David Miller’s contribution to the conceptual debate about how we should understand refugeehood. The second example is a common argument from the normative debate about how states should discharge their duties to help refugees, namely the claim that states should help in neighboring countries rather than by taking in more asylum seekers. Both are examples of arguments about how we should understand or respond to the refugee crisis, which appear to offer coherent principles for the moral guidance of political actors but which are actually incoherent as principles of practical reasoning for the context they aim to address.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17449626.2016.1247108
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
The Ethics of Immigration.Joseph Carens - 2013 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Realism in the Ethics of Immigration.James S. Pearson - forthcoming - Philosophy and Social Criticism:019145372210796.
Against the Alienage Condition for Refugeehood.Eilidh Beaton - 2020 - Law and Philosophy 39 (2):147-176.
Refugees, Displacement and Territorial Stability.Clara Sandelind - 2020 - Journal of Global Ethics 16 (2):162-181.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Refugees and States: A Normative Analysis.Joseph H. Carens - 1991 - In Howard Adelman (ed.), Canadian and American Refugee Policy. York Lanes Press. pp. 18-29.
The Refugee Crisis and The Right to Political Asylum.Michael A. Peters & Tina Besley - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (13-14):1367-1374.
The Refugee Crisis and Education: How Should Educators Respond?Nesta Devine - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (13-14):1375-1376.
Global Displacement and the Topography of Theory.Phillip Cole - 2016 - Journal of Global Ethics 12 (3):260-268.
Refugees, Limbo and the Australian Media.Ben Hightower - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (2):335-358.
Who Are Refugees?Matthew Lister* - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (5):645-671.
The Refugee Qualification Problems in LGBT Asylum Cases.Laurynas Biekša - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (4):1555-1565.
The Appeal and Danger of a New Refugee Convention.Luara Ferracioli - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (1):123-144.


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #300,887 of 2,519,576 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,332 of 2,519,576 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes