From Deconstruction to Rehabilitation: Heidegger, Gadamer, and Modernity

Dissertation, University of New Mexico (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This dissertation is a study of the problem of modernity, formulated as the following multivalent question: How should we understand the scope, character, and limitations of our historical age? The study approaches this question from the point of view of Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer. We will, first, clarify how Heidegger and Gadamer think about modernity, thereby shedding light on their widely misunderstood intellectual relationship; and, next, uncover and defend a distinctively Gadamerian response to modernity as a viable argument, and as potentially more coherent and hopeful than Heidegger’s answer to the problem of the modern age. In the first part, I present my reading of how these figures think about modernity. I outline Heidegger’s deconstruction of the modern age, that is, his main critique of modernity and his account of the movement into a postmodern future. Next, I motivate a contrast between Heidegger’s vision of modernity and Gadamer’s. Contrary to numerous misreadings, Gadamer proceeds along his own path of thinking, one that crucially begins with Heidegger but goes its own direction by advancing past the shortcomings of Heidegger’s thinking of modernity. The next part outlines my interpretation of Gadamer’s post-Heideggerian response to the modern age, arguing that he accomplishes this task by rediscovering what remains most true and meaningful in the guiding metaphors of the modern age, while criticizing the pernicious elements of modernity’s bequest to the present. First, I reconstruct and defend Gadamer’s rehabilitation of modernity’s guiding epistemic metaphors, namely, transcendental thought, humanism, experience, objectivity, and curiosity, against the backdrop of his critique of other elements of modernity’s epistemic regimes. Next, I make the same type of argument with regard to guiding ocular metaphors of infinity, perspective, and mirroring. A speculative Conclusion, on the political implications of Gadamer’s differences from Heidegger, suggests that the Gadamerian rehabilitation of modernity successfully engenders a more genuinely hopeful response to modernity than Heidegger provides. This short Conclusion again makes the case for Gadamer’s appreciable advancement beyond Heidegger.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Another Beginning? Heidegger, Gadamer, and Postmodernity.David Liakos - 2019 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (1):221-238.
The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer.Robert J. Dostal (ed.) - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
This Thinking Lacks a Language: Heidegger and Gadamer’s Question of Being.Paul Regan - 2015 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy (2):376-394.
The Role of the Concept “Person” in Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics.David Vessey - 2014 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):117-137.
Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy.Brice R. Wachterhauser (ed.) - 1986 - State University of New York Press.
Gadamer E a Herança Heideggeriana.R. Sampaio Da Silva - 2000 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 56 (3):521-541.
Gadamer e a Herança Heideggeriana.Rui Sampaio Da Silva - 2000 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 56 (3/4):521 - 541.
Sources of Hermeneutics.Jean Grondin - 1995 - State University of New York Press.
Gadamer, Kant, and the Enlightenment.Robert Dostal - 2016 - Research in Phenomenology 46 (3):337-348.


Added to PP

47 (#246,812)

6 months
5 (#143,702)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Liakos
Houston Community College System

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vindicating Reason.Onora O'Neill - 1992 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press. pp. 280--308.
Hermeneutics in Post-War Continental European Philosophy.David Liakos & Theodore George - 2019 - In Kelly Becker & Iain Thomson (eds.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945-2015. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 399-415.
Heidegger and Truth as Correspondence.Mark A. Wrathall - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):69 – 88.

View all 18 references / Add more references