Law and Philosophy 31 (6):703-724 (2012)

S. Matthew Liao
New York University
Many people believe in the intention principle, according to which an agent’s intention in performing an act can sometimes make an act that would otherwise have been permissible impermissible, other things being equal. Judith Jarvis Thomson, Frances Kamm and Thomas Scanlon have offered cases that seem to show that it can be permissible for an agent to act even when the agent has bad intentions. If valid, these cases would seem to cast doubt on the intention principle. In this paper, I point out that these cases have confounding factors that have received little attention in the literature. I argue that these confounding factors undermine the putative force of these cases against the intention principle. Indeed, when cases without these confounding factors are considered, it becomes clear, so I argue, that intentions can be relevant for the permissibility of an act.
Keywords intentions and permissibility  Frances Kamm  T.M. Scanlon
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-012-9134-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,339
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Self-Defense.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (4):283-310.
Intention and Permissibility, I.T. M. Scanlon - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):301–317.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Opportunistic Terrorism.Suzanne Uniacke - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (4):395-410.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Proximal Intentions, Intention-Reports, and Vetoing.Alfred Mele - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (1):1 – 14.
Scanlon on Permissibility and Double Effect.Jakob Elster - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):75-102.
Intentions and Discrimination in Hiring.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):55-74.
Acting on Intentions.Claire Finkelstein - 2007 - In Bruno Verbeek (ed.), Reasons and Intentions. Ashgate.
Intentions, Goals, and the Archaeological Record.Rex Welshon - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):425-426.
Conditional Intentions.Luca Ferrero - 2009 - Noûs 43 (4):700 - 741.
Collective and Joint Intention.Raimo Tuomela - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (2):39-69.
The Content of Intentions.Elisabeth Patherie - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (4):400-432.


Added to PP index

Total views
115 ( #93,086 of 2,448,744 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,869 of 2,448,744 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes