Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010
Qing-Jiao Liao, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Yu-Chen Fan, Ming-Hua Zheng, Yu Bai, Guy D. Eslick, Xing-Xiang He, Shi-Bing Zhang, Harry Hua-Xiang Xia & Hua He
Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2):629-645 (2018)
AbstractPublications by Chinese researchers in scientific journals have dramatically increased over the past decade; however, academic misconduct also becomes more prevalent in the country. The aim of this prospective study was to understand the perceptions of Chinese biomedical researchers towards academic misconduct and the trend from 2010 to 2015. A questionnaire comprising 10 questions was designed and then validated by ten biomedical researchers in China. In the years 2010 and 2015, respectively, the questionnaire was sent as a survey to biomedical researchers at teaching hospitals, universities, and medical institutes in mainland China. Data were analyzed by the Chi squared test, one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post hoc test, or Spearman’s rank correlation method, where appropriate. The overall response rates in 2010 and 2015 were 4.5% and 5.5%, respectively. Data from 15 participants in 2010 were invalid, and analysis was thus performed for 1263 participants. Among the participants, 54.7% thought that academic misconduct was serious-to-extremely serious, and 71.2% believed that the Chinese authorities paid no or little attention to the academic misconduct. Moreover, 70.2 and 65.2% of participants considered that the punishment for academic misconduct at the authority and institution levels, respectively, was not appropriate or severe enough. Inappropriate authorship and plagiarism were the most common forms of academic misconduct. The most important factor underlying academic misconduct was the academic assessment system, as judged by 50.7% of the participants. Participants estimated that 40.1% of published scientific articles were associated with some form of academic misconduct. Their perceptions towards academic misconduct had not significantly changed over the 5 years. Reform of the academic assessment system should be the fundamental approach to tackling this problem in China.
Similar books and articles
A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):211-228.
Academic Misconduct Among Business Students: A Comparison of the US and UAE.Steve Williams, Margaret Tanner, Jim Beard & Jacob Chacko - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (1):65-73.
Cognitive Enhancement and Academic Misconduct: A Study Exploring Their Frequency and Relationship.Veljko Dubljević, Sebastian Sattler & Éric Racine - 2014 - Ethics and Behavior 24 (5):408-420.
Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct Among a Group of Researchers in Nigeria.Theresa Rossouw Patrick Okonta - 2013 - Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):149-157.
Ethical Beliefs Toward Academic Dishonesty: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Undergraduate Students in Ukraine and the United States.Mariya A. Yukhymenko-Lescroart - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (1):29-41.
Self-Reported Attitudes and Behaviours of Medical Students in Pakistan Regarding Academic Misconduct: A Cross-Sectional Study.Kulsoom Ghias, Ghulam R. Lakho, Hamna Asim, Iqbal S. Azam & Sheikh A. Saeed - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):43.
Students' Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness and Academic Misconduct: An Inquiry Into the Multivariate Nature of a Complex Phenomenon.Amie R. McKibban - 2013 - Ethics and Behavior 23 (5):378-395.
Academic Integrity: The Relationship Between Individual and Situational Factors on Misconduct Contemplations.Jennifer L. Kisamore, Thomas H. Stone & I. M. Jawahar - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):381-394.
Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct Among a Group of Researchers in Nigeria.Patrick Okonta & Theresa Rossouw - 2013 - Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):149-157.
Encouraging Active Classroom Discussion of Academic Integrity and Misconduct in Higher Education Business Contexts.Mark Baetz, Lucia Zivcakova, Eileen Wood, Amanda Nosko, Domenica De Pasquale & Karin Archer - 2011 - Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):217-234.
Chinese Academic Assessment and Incentive System.Qinghui Suo - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):297-299.
Academic Dishonesty: An In-Depth Investigation of Assessing Measurable Constructs and a Call for Consistency in Scholarship. [REVIEW]Amie R. McKibban & Charles A. Burdsal - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):185-197.
An Examination of Academic Misconduct Intentions and the Ineffectiveness of Syllabus Statements.Sara Staats & Julie M. Hupp - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (4):239 - 247.
Misconduct in Research: A Descriptive Survey of Attitudes, Perceptions and Associated Factors in a Developing Country.Patrick I. Okonta & Theresa Rossouw - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):25.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain.Ramón A. Feenstra, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar & Daniel Pallarés-Domínguez - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1):1-21.
Perceptions of Plagiarism by Biomedical Researchers: An Online Survey in Europe and China.Kris Dierickx, Benoit Nemery & Nannan Yi - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-16.
Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature From Open Access Journals.Tao Wang, Qin-Rui Xing, Hui Wang & Wei Chen - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (3):855-868.
Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.Nannan Yi, Benoit Nemery & Kris Dierickx - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1271-1301.
Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan.Pablo Pellegrini - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1297-1313.
References found in this work
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-Analysis of Surveys.Vanja Pupovac & Daniele Fanelli - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1331-1352.
Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.Vanja Pupovac, Snježana Prijić-Samaržija & Mladen Petrovečki - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):165-181.
Research Ethics and Lessons From Hwanggate: What Can We Learn From the Korean Cloning Fraud?R. Saunders & J. Savulescu - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):214-221.
Ethical Modernization: Research Misconduct and Research Ethics Reforms in Korea Following the Hwang Affair.Jongyoung Kim & Kibeom Park - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):355-380.
The Acid Test for Biological Science: STAP Cells, Trust, and Replication.Cheryl Lancaster - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):147-167.