The Vanity of Small Differences: Empirical Studies of Artistic Value and Extrinsic Factors

Aesthetic Investigations 4 (1):412-427 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


To what extent are factors that are extrinsic to the artwork relevant to judgments of artistic value? One might approach this question using traditional philosophical methods, but one can also approach it using empirical methods; that is, by doing experimental philosophical aesthetics. This paper provides an example of the latter approach. We report two empirical studies that examine the significance of three sorts of extrinsic factors for judgments of artistic value: the causal-historical factor of contagion, the ontological factor of uniqueness, and the contextual factor of appreciative environment. We explore the context of appreciation by performing studies in a museum as well as the lab. We found that contagion made a difference to judgments of artistic value in both settings. These results are congruent with previous empirical research as well as recent philosophical work that defends the artistic significance of authenticity. However, uniqueness only made a difference in the lab setting, but not in the museum. This suggests that the context of appreciation may make a difference to judgments of artistic value. Of broader significance, these studies show the value of experimental philosophical aesthetics and the value of doing in situ empirical research on art.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On a Proposed Test for Artistic Value.Julian Dodd - 2014 - British Journal of Aesthetics 54 (4):395-407.
Extended artistic appreciation.Robert A. Wilson - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (2):162-163.
For the Love of Art: Artistic Values and Appreciative Virtue.Matthew Kieran - 2012 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 71:13-31.
Artistic Crimes and Misdemeanours.David Davies - 2019 - British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (3):305-321.
Artistic Research: Delusions, Confusions and Differentiations.Josef Früchtl - 2019 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 3 (2):124-134.
Artistic Value is Attributive Goodness.Louise Hanson - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (4):415-427.
Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2016 - In John Hawthorne, Herman Cappelen & Tamar Szabó Gendler (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. New York: pp. 657-670.
A Survey of Artistic Value: From Analytic Philosophy to Neurobiology.Zachary P. Norwood - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (2):135-152.
Toward an Aesthetics of Creative Practice.Aaron Stoller - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology 4 (1):45-56.
Explanatory Dualism in Empirical Aesthetics A New Reading.Elisabeth Schellekens - 2012 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (9-10):9-10.
Experimental Philosophy of Aesthetics.Florian Cova, Amanda Garcia & Shen-yi Liao - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):927-939.


Added to PP

180 (#77,688)

6 months
51 (#34,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Shen-yi Liao
University of Puget Sound
Jade Fletcher
University of St. Andrews
Aaron Meskin
University of Georgia

Citations of this work

Experimental philosophy of aesthetics.Florian Cova - forthcoming - In Max Bauer & Stephan Kornmesser (eds.), Compact compendium of experimental philosophy. De Gruyter.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
Mind embodied and embedded.John Haugeland - 1993 - In Yu-Houng H. Houng & J. Ho (eds.), Mind and Cognition: 1993 International Symposium. Academica Sinica. pp. 233-267.
The transfiguration of the commonplace.Arthur C. Danto - 1974 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (2):139-148.
An ontology of art.Gregory Currie - 1989 - New York: St. Martin's Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references