Revaluing Laws of Nature in Secularized Science

In Yemima Ben-Menahem (ed.), Rethinking the Concept of Law of Nature: Natural Order in the Light of Contemporary Science. Springer. pp. 347-377 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discovering laws of nature was a way to worship a law-giving God, during the Scientific Revolution. So why should we consider it worthwhile now, in our own more secularized science? For historical perspective, I examine two competing early modern theological traditions that related laws of nature to different divine attributes, and their secular legacy in views ranging from Kant and Nietzsche to Humean and ‘governing’ accounts in recent analytic metaphysics. Tracing these branching offshoots of ethically charged God-concepts sheds light on how our ethical ideals and ideas of natural order can still be valuably integrated. Early modern intellectualists valued the law-governed order of nature as a sign of divine Reason. In turn, Reason traditionally ascribed to God has now been partly reclaimed for humans, reframing the value of natural order anthropocentrically, in terms of the value of our own intelligence. Alternatively, Reason may be reclaimed for nature itself, as in an ‘objective’ idealism or metaphysical rationalism. However, beyond divine Reason, an influential voluntarist tradition in theology stressed a connection between laws of nature and God’s Power or free Will. Tracking how divine Power has been reinvested in human beings provides a broader context for instrumentalism and related lineages of empiricism. But secularization can also transfer Power from God to the impersonal natural world. In this light, current scientific interest in lawlike order may also reflect the inherent value of brute necessity or inhuman causal power in nature: this is a deeper way to reject anthropocentrism and to show our respect for the environment.

Similar books and articles

Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary?Johanna Wolff - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):898-906.
Breaking Laws of Nature.Jeffrey Koperski - 2017 - Philosophia Christi 19 (1):83-101.
Readings on Laws of Nature.John W. Carroll (ed.) - 2004 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Newtonian Science, Miracles, and the Laws of Nature.Peter Harrison - 1995 - Journal of the History of Ideas 56 (4):531 - 553.
Platonism and laws: A reply to Demetra Sfendoni‐Mentzou.James Robert Brown - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (3):243 – 246.
Models: The blueprints for laws.Nancy Cartwright - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):303.
Explanation, Laws, and Causation.Wei Wang - 2017 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Laws and symmetry.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Realismus in duhems naturgemässer klassifikation.Alex Burri - 1996 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27 (2):203 - 213.
Kant and the Laws of Nature.Michela Massimi & Angela Breitenbach (eds.) - 2017 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-11

Downloads
509 (#37,220)

6 months
169 (#18,871)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eli I. Lichtenstein
University of Edinburgh

References found in this work

How the laws of physics lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The metaphysics within physics.Tim Maudlin - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Sydney Shoemaker.
Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties.Alexander Bird - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 127 references / Add more references