Interface transparency and the psychosemantics of most

Natural Language Semantics 19 (3):227-256 (2011)
Abstract
This paper proposes an Interface Transparency Thesis concerning how linguistic meanings are related to the cognitive systems that are used to evaluate sentences for truth/falsity: a declarative sentence S is semantically associated with a canonical procedure for determining whether S is true; while this procedure need not be used as a verification strategy, competent speakers are biased towards strategies that directly reflect canonical specifications of truth conditions. Evidence in favor of this hypothesis comes from a psycholinguistic experiment examining adult judgments concerning ‘Most of the dots are blue’. This sentence is true if and only if the number of blue dots exceeds the number of nonblue dots. But this leaves unsettled, e.g., how the second cardinality is specified for purposes of understanding and/or verification: via the nonblue things, given a restriction to the dots, as in ‘|{x: Dot(x) & ~Blue(x)}|’; via the blue things, given the same restriction, and subtraction from the number of dots, as in ‘|{x: Dot(x)}| – |{x: Dot(x) & Blue(x)}|’; or in some other way. Psycholinguistic evidence and psychophysical modeling support the second hypothesis
Keywords Analog magnitude  Approximate number system  Semantics–cognition interface  Number  Quantification  Mathematics   Most  Language processing  Language development
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11050-010-9062-6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Vision.David Marr - 1982 - Freeman.
Vison.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Iterating Semantic Automata.Shane Steinert-Threlkeld & I. I. I. Thomas F. Icard - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (2):151-173.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Physicalism Without Pop-Out.Philip Pettit - 2009 - In David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola (eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. MIT Press.
11. Bright Dots, Dot Coms, and Camelot?Timothy L. Fort - 2001 - The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:222-230.
Preparatory Attention: Experiment and Theory.David LaBerge, L. Auclair & E. Sieroff - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (3):396-434.
The Use of Dots as Brackets in Church's System.A. M. Turing - 1942 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):146-156.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-22

Total downloads

36 ( #139,642 of 2,153,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums