Interface transparency and the psychosemantics of most

Natural Language Semantics 19 (3):227-256 (2011)

Authors
Paul Pietroski
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
This paper proposes an Interface Transparency Thesis concerning how linguistic meanings are related to the cognitive systems that are used to evaluate sentences for truth/falsity: a declarative sentence S is semantically associated with a canonical procedure for determining whether S is true; while this procedure need not be used as a verification strategy, competent speakers are biased towards strategies that directly reflect canonical specifications of truth conditions. Evidence in favor of this hypothesis comes from a psycholinguistic experiment examining adult judgments concerning ‘Most of the dots are blue’. This sentence is true if and only if the number of blue dots exceeds the number of nonblue dots. But this leaves unsettled, e.g., how the second cardinality is specified for purposes of understanding and/or verification: via the nonblue things, given a restriction to the dots, as in ‘|{x: Dot(x) & ~Blue(x)}|’; via the blue things, given the same restriction, and subtraction from the number of dots, as in ‘|{x: Dot(x)}| – |{x: Dot(x) & Blue(x)}|’; or in some other way. Psycholinguistic evidence and psychophysical modeling support the second hypothesis
Keywords Analog magnitude  Approximate number system  Semantics–cognition interface  Number  Quantification  Mathematics   Most  Language processing  Language development
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11050-010-9062-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,419
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vison.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
Core Systems of Number.Stanislas Dehaene, Elizabeth Spelke & Lisa Feigenson - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (7):307-314.

View all 53 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Compositionality Without Word Boundaries: (The) More and (the) Most.Anna Szabolcsi - 2012 - Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 22.
Iterating Semantic Automata.Shane Steinert-Threlkeld & I. I. I. Thomas F. Icard - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (2):151-173.
Lexical Flexibility, Natural Language, and Ontology.Christopher A. Vogel - 2016 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):1-44.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Physicalism Without Pop-Out.Philip Pettit - 2009 - In David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola (eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. MIT Press.
11. Bright Dots, Dot Coms, and Camelot?Timothy L. Fort - 2001 - The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:222-230.
The Use of Dots as Brackets in Church's System.A. M. Turing - 1942 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):146-156.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
65 ( #129,047 of 2,272,221 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #40,369 of 2,272,221 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature