Intentional Parenthood and the Nuclear Family

Journal of Medical Humanities 23 (2):107-118 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reproductive techniques and practices, ranging from ordinary birth-control measures and artificial insemination to embryo transfer and surrogate motherhood, have greatly enhanced our range of reproductive choices. As a consequence, they pose a number of difficult moral and legal questions with regard to the formation of a family and our conception of parenthood. A view that is becoming increasingly common is that parental rights and responsibilities should not be based on genetic relationships but should instead be seen as arising from agreements or contracts between individuals. Accordingly, a man who consents to his wife's artificial insemination by donor (AID) and not the sperm donor, is the legal father of the child; in surrogacy agreements, the intending mother, and not the surrogate, has the right to raise the resulting child. While agreeing that biology should not form the basis for assigning legal parenthood, I argue that the theory of intentional parenthood, despite being put forward as a liberal theory, is geared toward or will have the function of protecting the nuclear family and inhibiting the formation of alternative family forms

Other Versions

edition van Zyl, Liezl (2002) "Intentional Parenthood: Responsibilities in Surrogate Motherhood". Health Care Analysis 10(2):165-175

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,006

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
110 (#167,289)

6 months
18 (#237,640)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Liezl Van Zyl
University of Waikato