Authors
Hon-Lam Li
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Abstract
Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. offers erudite and compelling arguments for the view that all families should try to realize the traditional family. Although I tend to agree with him from my personal standpoint, I doubt that this view can be justified to those with whom we are in reasonable disagreement about the family. I make three critical points. First, though Engelhardt stops short of saying that the state should encourage people to form traditonal families, or discourage those who do not, some state perfectionists might do so. From the perspective of public reason, it is unjust for the state to favor some conceptions of the good over others, if these conceptions are all reasonable. Moreover, those whose conceptions of the good are not favored would feel that they are disrespected. Second, insofar as Engelhardt thinks that all families should try to realize the traditional families, the traditional family would not be a good to those who do not like children. Moreover, it would be difficult to persuade those who have decided not to have children for reasons of career, burden, or more altruistic concern. Third, against Engelhardt’s stance against the “egalitarian aspirations” of liberalism, I argue that too often women sacrifice their possible careers for the sake of the family, even should they hold advanced degrees from prestigious universities, or professional qualifications. This kind of injustice is too uncomfortable to ignore.
Keywords Tristram Engelhardt  The Family  Public Reason  John Rawls  T. M. Scanlon
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Moral Inevitability of Two Tiers of Health Care.H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr & Response by Joel James Shuman - 2007 - In Margaret Monahan Hogan & David Solomon (eds.), Medical Ethics at Notre Dame: The J. Philip Clarke Family Lectures, 1988-1999. [South Bend, Ind.?]The Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture.
Family Matters.John Haldane - 2006 - Philosophy 81 (4):581-594.
The Future of the Family.David Archard - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):132-142.
Nihilism, Relativism, and Engelhardt.Michael Wreen - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (1):73-88.
Is the Family Uniquely Valuable?Anca Gheaus - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):120-131.
Is There a Moral Reason To Limit Family Size?Scott Wisor - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 29 (3/4):26-31.
The Foundations of Bioethics: Contingency and Relevance.Mark P. Aulisio - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (4):428 – 438.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-11-14

Total views
379 ( #24,433 of 2,462,782 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #65,193 of 2,462,782 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes