Authors
David Liggins
University of Manchester
Abstract
Some philosophers have recently suggested that the reason mathematics is useful in science is that it expands our expressive capacities. Of these philosophers, only Stephen Yablo has put forward a detailed account of how mathematics brings this advantage. In this article, I set out Yablo’s view and argue that it is implausible. Then, I introduce a simpler account and show it is a serious rival to Yablo’s. 1 Introduction2 Yablo’s Expressionism3 Psychological Objections to Yablo’s Expressionism4 Introducing Belief Expressionism5 Objections and Replies5.1 Yablo’s likely response5.2 Charity6 Conclusion
Keywords fictionalism  mathematics  pretence  make-believe  Yablo
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axt012
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Realism, Mathematics and Modality.Hartry Field - 1988 - Philosophical Topics 16 (1):57-107.

View all 58 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Representational Indispensability and Ontological Commitment.John Heron - 2020 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):105-114.
Good Weasel Hunting.Robert Knowles & David Liggins - 2015 - Synthese 192 (10):3397-3412.
Non‐Factualism Versus Nominalism.Matteo Plebani - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (3).

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-11-09

Total views
933 ( #3,825 of 2,325,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #7,461 of 2,325,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes