Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice 30 (2):185-193 (2010)
Our article identifies and describes the metaphoric fallacy to a deductive inference (MFDI) that is an example of incorrect reasoning along the lines of the false analogy fallacy. The MFDI proceeds from informal semantical (metaphorical) claims to a supposedly formally deductive and necessary inference. We charge that such an inference is invalid. We provide three examples of the MFDI to demonstrate the structure of this invalid form of reasoning. Our goal is to contribute to the set of known informal fallacies.
|Keywords||analogy critical thinking fallacy metaphor Nietzsche Sartre Phaedo|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Common Nonsense: 25 Fallacies About Life (and Their Solutions).Cliff Ermatinger - 2005 - Circle Press.
Hilary Putnam's Dialectical Thinking: An Application to Fallacy Theory. [REVIEW]Louise Cummings - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (2):197-229.
Second Thoughts: Critical Thinking for a Diverse Society.Wanda Teays - 2009 - Mcgraw-Hill Higher Education.
A Characterization of the One-Sidedness Fallacy Within the Framework of the Cognitive Distortions.Dr Paul Franceschi - manuscript
The 'Passes-For' Fallacy and the Future of Critical Thinking.William Goodwin - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):363-374.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads40 ( #129,922 of 2,171,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?