God's Knowledge of Particulars

Abstract
This article offers a comparative study of three thinkers from almost as many intellectual and cultural traditions: Avicenna, Maimonides, and Gersonides, and discusses the extent of the knowledge of particulars which each one ascribed to God. Avicenna de-reified Aristotle’s abstract and isolated Prime Mover and argued that God can know particulars but limited these to universals. Maimonides disanalogized divine from human knowledge, arguing that the epistemic mode predicated of mankind cannot be equally predicated of God, and that God knows particulars qua particulars even as his Knowing encompasses all of eternity in a single act of knowledge. Attempting an intermediate path between the former’s highly discursive reasoning and the latter’s more scriptural approach, Gersonides postulated that God can know particulars qua particulars—as is befitting a Perfect Being—but this He does ‘mediately’ as it were, via the emanative ordering comprising the separate intelligences and culminating in the Active Intellect
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1536-4569
DOI 10.5840/islamicphil200954
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On Knowledge of Particulars.Peter Adamson - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):273–294.
Spinoza and Indexicals.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1997 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):3 – 22.
Maimonides on Divine Knowledge—Moses of Narbonne's Averroist Reading.Charles H. Manekin - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):51-74.
Gersonides' Account of God's Knowledge of Particulars.Norbert Max Samuelson - 1972 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 10 (4):399-416.
Russell on the Relations of Universals and Particulars.Larry Lee Blackman - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:265-278.
Spatiotemporal and Spatial Particulars.Noa Latham - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):17-35.
Particulars and Acquaintance.Laird Addis - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (3):251-259.
Universals and Particulars: Readings in Ontology.Michael J. Loux (ed.) - 1970 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Bare Particulars.Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Perceptual Cognition: A Nyaya-Kantian Approach.Monima Chadha - 2001 - Philosophy East and West 51 (2):197-209.
Particulars As Universals.Herbert Hochberg - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:83-111.
The Red of a Rose. On the Significance of Stout's Category of Abstract Particulars.Maria van der Schaar - 2004 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):197-216.
Added to PP index
2011-12-02

Total downloads
42 ( #138,134 of 2,225,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #423,227 of 2,225,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature