Philosophy through Machine Learning

Teaching Philosophy 43 (1):29-46 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In a previous article (2019), I motivated and defended the idea of teaching philosophy through computer science. In this article, I will further develop this idea and discuss how machine learning can be used for pedagogical purposes because of its tight affinity with philosophical issues surrounding induction. To this end, I will discuss three areas of significant overlap: (i) good / bad data and David Hume’s so-called Problem of Induction, (ii) validation and accommodation vs. prediction in scientific theory selection and (iii) feature engineering and Nelson Goodman’s so-called New Riddle of Induction.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Gruesome are the No-free-lunch Theorems for Machine Learning?Davor Lauc - 2018 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):479-485.
Inductive learning by machines.Stuart Russell - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 64 (October):37-64.
Philosophy and machine learning.Paul Thagard - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):261-76.
Statistical Machine Learning and the Logic of Scientific Discovery.Antonino Freno - 2009 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (2):375-388.
In Defense of Service Learning.H. M. Geibel - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):93-109.
Philosophy through Computer Science.Daniel Lim - 2019 - Teaching Philosophy 42 (2):141-153.


Added to PP

50 (#320,151)

6 months
7 (#439,668)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Lim
Duke Kunshan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references