Sophia 59 (3):437-456 (2020)

Kent Lin
Buddhist Tzu-Chi University
With the naturalist worldview having become widely accepted, the trend of naturalistic Buddhism has likewise become popular in both academic and religious circles. In this article, I preliminarily reflect on this naturalized approach to Buddhism in two main sections. In section 1, I point out that the Buddha rejects theistic beliefs that claim absolute power over our destiny, opting instead to encourage us to inquire intellectually and behave morally. The distinguishing characteristics of naturalism such as a humanistic approach, rational enquiry, empirical observation, as well as a pragmatic and realistic outlook can all be seen in the Buddha’s teachings. In section 2, however, I advance arguments to show that while the Buddha is opposed to theistic doctrines, his views are not entirely in accordance with the presuppositions of naturalism. Firstly, the Buddha’s foremost concern is not purely intellectual in nature—the purpose of his teachings is to realize a soteriological goal through spiritual practice. Secondly, naturalism tends to subscribe to ‘self-being,’ while the Buddha holds all things to exist conditionally and impermanently. Because of the dependent nature of all things, it is not possible to discover their essence through reduction. Thirdly, naturalized philosophy would be a kind of belief-habit that follows from certain preconditioned assumptions. But the Buddha encourages us to re-examine our conceptual proliferation leading to biased views, as that ultimately leads to suffering. I conclude by proposing a broader naturalist outlook that would allow for a more inclusive conception of the natural world that would take the axiological dimension of human transcendence into account and increase an overall understanding of human potentiality.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-019-00734-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Word and Object.Willard van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Retrieving Realism.Hubert Dreyfus & Charles Taylor - 2015 - Harvard University Press.
Mind and World.John Mcdowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Contemporary Relevance of Buddha.Amartya Sen - 2014 - Ethics and International Affairs 28 (1):15-27.
Philosophy of the Buddha. [REVIEW]L. M. T. - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 13 (2):354-354.
Jesus and The Buddha's Ultimate Concern.Yue Lu - 1997 - Philosophy and Culture 24 (9):827-841.
An Easier Way to Become a Buddha?Fuchuan Yao - 2012 - Asian Philosophy 22 (2):121-132.
Reading the Buddha as a Philosopher.Douglass Smith & Justin Whitaker - 2016 - Philosophy East and West 66 (2):515-538.


Added to PP index

Total views
28 ( #393,035 of 2,454,701 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #84,331 of 2,454,701 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes