Journal of Business Ethics 76 (4):413-426 (2007)

Authors
Lars Lindblom
Linkoping University
Abstract
The ethical debate on whistleblowing concerns centrally the conflict between the right to political free speech and the duty of loyalty to the organization where one works. This is the moral dilemma of whistleblowing. Political free speech is justified because it is a central part of liberal democracy, whereas loyalty can be motivated as a way of showing consideration for one’s associates. The political philosophy of John Rawls is applied to this dilemma, and it is shown that the requirement of loyalty, in the sense that is needed to create the moral dilemma of whistleblowing, is inconsistent with that theory. In this sense, there is no moral dilemma of whistleblowing. This position has been labelled extreme in that it says that whistleblowing is always morally permitted. In a discussion and rejection of Richard De George’s criteria on permissible whistleblowing, it is pointed out that the mere rejection of loyalty will not lead to an extreme position; harms can still be taken into account. Furthermore, it is argued that the best way is, in this as in most other political circumstances, to weigh harms is provided by the free speech argument from democracy.
Keywords free speech  justice as fairness  loyalty  permission for whistleblowing  whistleblowing
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9291-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,295
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
Realizing Rawls.Thomas Winfried Menko Pogge - 1989 - Cornell University Press.
A Right to Do Wrong.Jeremy Waldron - 1981 - Ethics 92 (1):21-39.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work.Lars Lindblom - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):577-599.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Whistleblowing and the Bioethicist’s Public Obligations.D. Robert Macdougall - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (4):431-442.
Whistleblowing and Organizational Ethics.Susan L. Ray - 2006 - Nursing Ethics 13 (4):438-445.
Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty.Robert A. Larmer - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):125 - 128.
A Levinasian Approach to Whistleblowing.Amanda Loumansky & David Lewis - 2013 - Philosophy of Management 12 (3):27-48.
The Psychology of Whistleblowing.Joan E. Sieber - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):7-23.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
290 ( #32,015 of 2,448,687 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,803 of 2,448,687 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes