Kant on Criminal Punishment

Journal of Philosophical Research 19:61-74 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Kant maintains that retribution is the only morally sound justification for criminal punishment. He claims that all just criminal punishment must conform to the “principle of equality,” an inflexible juridical rule which takes the form of a categorical imperative. Focusing on his further claim that the principle of equality establishes that capital punishment is the only suitable punishment for murder, I question Kant’s contention that the principle of equality is a categorical imperative. Following two lines of inquiry drawing upon the nature of a categorical imperative, I suggest that the principle of equality is a principle conditioned by experience, a hypothetical imperative which Kant only shows to be consistent with, not necessarily mandated by, the idea of a just civil state.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant on Criminal Punishment.Douglas Lind - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:61-74.
A Concepção De Justiça Penal Na Doutrina Do Direito De Kant.Robinson Santos - 2011 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 10 (3):103-114.
Kantian Right and the Categorical Imperative: Response to Willaschek.Michael Nance - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (4):541-556.
Kant's Theory of Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (2):206.
Kant on capital punishment and suicide.Attila Ataner - 2006 - Kant Studien 97 (4):452-482.
Punishment and the Spirit of Democracy.George Kateb - 2007 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 74:269-306.
Punishment and the Spirit of Democracy.George Kateb - 2007 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 74 (2):269-306.
The Golden Rule Principle in African Ethics and Kant’s Categorical Imperative.Godwin Azenabor - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:17-23.
Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment.George Schedler - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.


Added to PP

16 (#911,065)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Lind
Virginia Tech

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references