Non-empirical robustness arguments in quantum gravity

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 72:70-86 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.06.001

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,006

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Prerequisites for a Consistent Framework of Quantum Gravity.Tian Yu Cao - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (2):181-204.
Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, Contemporary Theories in Quantum Gravity.Callender Craig & Huggett Nick - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (3):531-537.
Physics meets philosophy at the planck scale: contemporary theories in quantum gravity.T. Maudlin - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (3):531-537.
The emergence of spacetime in quantum theories of gravity.Nick Huggett - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):273-275.
Interpreting quantum gravity.Dean Rickles - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (4):691-715.
The asymptotic safety scenario for quantum gravity – An appraisal.Simon Friederich - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 63:65-73.
Does time differ from change? Philosophical appraisal of the problem of time in quantum gravity and in physics.Alexis de Saint-Ours - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part A):48-54.
Does time differ from change? Philosophical appraisal of the problem of time in quantum gravity and in physics: A response.Julian Barbour - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part A):55-61.
Niels Bohr and the construction of a new philosophy.J. H. - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (1):107-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-21

Downloads
32 (#559,534)

6 months
13 (#404,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Niels Linnemann
University of Geneva

Citations of this work

Convergence strategies for theory assessment.Elena Castellani - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 104 (C):78-87.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy.P. D. Magnus & Craig Callender - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (3):320-338.
Robustness Analysis.Michael Weisberg - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):730-742.
The case for black hole thermodynamics part II: Statistical mechanics.David Wallace - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 66 (C):103-117.

View all 15 references / Add more references