Race and viewer evaluations of ethically controversial tv news stories

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (1):40 – 52 (1996)
Abstract
Interviews with 111 African-American and European-Americans investigated racial differences in viewer evaluations of ethically controversial TV news stories. The study focused on judgments of whether three news stories (Genniger Flowers's alleged affair with Bill Clinton, a hit-and-run accident, and racial discrimination by Realtors) should be aired, the criteria applied in reaching those judgements, and the indications of reasons to attend to or to reject each story. No simple relationship was found between race and judgments of whether the stories should be aired, but when story relevance was considered, the relationship became clearer. There appears to be a complex relationship between the viewers' lived experience, story content, and story evaluation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15327728jmme1101_5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,755
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethical Standards of French and U.S. Newspaper Journalists.Aralynn Abare McMane - 1993 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 8 (4):207 – 218.
Eye on Soweto: A Study of Factors in News Photo Use.Sue O'Brien - 1993 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 8 (2):69 – 87.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Care As a Virtue for Journalists.Linda Steiner & Chad Okrusch - 2006 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 21 (2):102-122.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
12 ( #439,299 of 2,263,132 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #382,759 of 2,263,132 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature