Journal of Business Ethics 70 (4):411-428 (2007)
Abstract |
Tacit knowledge sharing discussed in this study is important in the area of business ethics, because an unwillingness to share knowledge that may hurt an organization’s survival is seen as being seriously unethical. In the proposed model of this study, distributive justice, procedural justice, and cooperativeness influence tacit knowledge sharing indirectly via two mediators: organizational commitment and trust in co-workers. Accordingly, instrumental ties and expressive ties influence tacit knowledge sharing indirectly only via the mediation of trust in co-workers. The model is assessed by using data from different companies’ employees, who attend an evening college in Taiwan for advance study. The test results of this study indicate that tacit knowledge sharing is affected by distributive justice, procedural justice, and cooperativeness indirectly via organizational commitment. Additionally, tacit knowledge sharing is also affected by distributive justice, instrumental ties, and expressive ties via trust in co-workers. The paths from procedural justice and cooperativeness to trust in co-workers are shown to be insignificant. Managerial implications of the empirical findings are also provided.
|
Keywords | Knowledge management organizational commitment trust in co-workers justice cooperativeness |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10551-006-9119-0 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice.E. Allan Lind & Tom R. Tyler - 1988 - Springer Science & Business Media.
The Effects of Ethical Climates on Organizational Commitment: A Two-Study Analysis.John B. Cullen, K. Praveen Parboteeah & Bart Victor - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):127-141.
An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace.Gwen E. Jones & Michael J. Kavanagh - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):511 - 523.
Trust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing.Domingo García-Marzá - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 57 (3):209-219.
View all 12 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Top-Down Knowledge Hiding in Organizations: An Empirical Study of the Consequences of Supervisor Knowledge Hiding Among Local and Foreign Workers in the Middle East.Ghulam Ali Arain, Zeeshan Ahmed Bhatti, Naeem Ashraf & Yu-Hui Fang - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 164 (3):611-625.
Coping with Loneliness Through Materialism: Strategies Matter for Adolescent Development of Unethical Behaviors.Elodie Gentina, L. J. Shrum & Tina M. Lowrey - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 152 (1):103-122.
To Share or Not to Share: Assessing Knowledge Sharing, Interemployee Helping, and Their Antecedents Among Online Knowledge Workers.Chieh-Peng Lin & Sheng-Wuu Joe - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):439 - 449.
Intellectual Capital Management Enablers: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.Robert G. Isaac, Irene M. Herremans & Theresa J. Kline - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3):373-391.
Exploring the Factors That Influence the Intention to Co-Create Open Educational Resources: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective.Xiaochen Wang, Ruisha Han & Harrison Hao Yang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
To Share or Not to Share: Assessing Knowledge Sharing, Interemployee Helping, and Their Antecedents Among Online Knowledge Workers.Chieh-Peng Lin & Sheng-Wuu Joe - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):439 - 449.
On Sharing a Pie: Modeling Costly Prosocial Behavior.Vladimir A. Lefebvre - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):565-566.
Egg-Share Donors' and Recipients' Knowledge, Motivations and Concerns: Clinical and Policy Implications.Zeynep B. Gürtin, Kamal K. Ahuja & Susan Golombok - 2012 - Clinical Ethics 7 (4):183-192.
Liberal Neutrality: Constructivist, Not Foundationalist.Lendell Horne - 2009 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 4 (2):151-158.
Relevance Theory and Shared Content.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2007 - In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 115--135.
Is There a Duty to Share? Ethics of Sharing Research Data in the Context of Public Health Emergencies.P. Langat, D. Pisartchik, D. Silva, C. Bernard, K. Olsen, M. Smith, S. Sahni & R. Upshur - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (1):4-11.
Sharing and Sharing Alike: Political Unity in Diverse Democracies.Michaele Lynne Ferguson - 2003 - Dissertation, Harvard University
A Clinical Perspective on Tacit Knowledge and Its Varieties.Stephen G. Henry - 2011 - Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):13-17.
Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions and Emotions.Frances Anderson (ed.) - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Tacit Knowledge Meets Analytic Kantianism.Stephen Turner - 2014 - Tradition and Discovery 41 (1):33-47.
Individual, Social and Organizational Sources of Sharing and Variation in the Ethical Reasoning of Managers.Neil A. Granitz - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 42 (2):101 - 124.
Tacit Knowledge, Implicit Learning and Scientific Reasoning.Andrea Pozzali - 2007 - Mind and Society 7 (2):227-237.
Revealing Tacit Knowledge: Embodiment and Explication.Frank Adloff (ed.) - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
34 ( #335,242 of 2,507,393 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,393 )
2009-01-28
Total views
34 ( #335,242 of 2,507,393 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,393 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads