Journal of Business Ethics 70 (4):411-428 (2007)

Tacit knowledge sharing discussed in this study is important in the area of business ethics, because an unwillingness to share knowledge that may hurt an organization’s survival is seen as being seriously unethical. In the proposed model of this study, distributive justice, procedural justice, and cooperativeness influence tacit knowledge sharing indirectly via two mediators: organizational commitment and trust in co-workers. Accordingly, instrumental ties and expressive ties influence tacit knowledge sharing indirectly only via the mediation of trust in co-workers. The model is assessed by using data from different companies’ employees, who attend an evening college in Taiwan for advance study. The test results of this study indicate that tacit knowledge sharing is affected by distributive justice, procedural justice, and cooperativeness indirectly via organizational commitment. Additionally, tacit knowledge sharing is also affected by distributive justice, instrumental ties, and expressive ties via trust in co-workers. The paths from procedural justice and cooperativeness to trust in co-workers are shown to be insignificant. Managerial implications of the empirical findings are also provided.
Keywords Knowledge management  organizational commitment  trust in co-workers  justice  cooperativeness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9119-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice.E. Allan Lind & Tom R. Tyler - 1988 - Springer Science & Business Media.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Sharing a Pie: Modeling Costly Prosocial Behavior.Vladimir A. Lefebvre - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):565-566.
Liberal Neutrality: Constructivist, Not Foundationalist.Lendell Horne - 2009 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 4 (2):151-158.
Relevance Theory and Shared Content.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2007 - In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 115--135.
Tacit Knowledge Meets Analytic Kantianism.Stephen Turner - 2014 - Tradition and Discovery 41 (1):33-47.
What Principlism Misses.T. Walker - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):229-231.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #335,242 of 2,507,393 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,393 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes