Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):462-488 (2010)
Discussion in this paper focuses on how strongly we should prefer non-punishment of persons guilty of serious crimes to punishment of persons innocent of them. William Blackstone's version of that preference, expressed as a ten to one ratio, is first shown to be untenable on standard accounts of legal punishment's justifying aims. Somewhat weaker versions of that ratio also appear suspect. More to the point, Blackstone's adage obscures the crucial way in which there are risks to be assessed in setting up a criminal justice system - the risk that it will not be eff ective enough at apprehending and punishing serious off enders, as well as the risk that it will expose innocent persons to harsh punishment. I urge a balancing of such risks, and argue that the salient features of many contemporary criminal justice systems can be plausibly interpreted as attempting to achieve and maintain such a balance. We do not grant criminal defendants a presumption of innocence that the state must overcome with proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in order to institutionally express a strong degree of preference for non-punishment of the guilty to punishment of the innocent. Instead, we do so in order to ensure that institutions of legal punishment have suffi cient scope while preserving their ability to accurately sort the guilty from the innocent
|Keywords||PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE REASONABLE DOUBT DETERRENCE CRIMINAL TRIALS INCAPACITATION RETRIBUTION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
In Defence of Reasonable Doubt.Georgi Gardiner - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):221-241.
The Prosecutor and the Presumption of Innocence.Richard L. Lippke - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):337-352.
Desert, Bell Motion, and Fairness.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):639-655.
Similar books and articles
Retributivism and the Inadvertent Punishment of the Innocent.Larry Alexander - 1983 - Law and Philosophy 2 (2):233 - 246.
Punishing the Innocent — Unintentionally.Alan Wertheimer - 1977 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):45 – 65.
''Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons''.Zachary Hoskins - 2011 - Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8 (2):369-384.
Not Penal Substitution but Vicarious Punishment.Mark C. Murphy - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):253-273.
Punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2012 - In Deen Chatterjee (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Springer. pp. 915-17.
Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment.George Schedler - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.
The Innocent in the Just War Thinking of Vitoria and Suárez: A Challenge Even for Secular Just War Theorists and International Law.Vicente Medina - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (1):47-64.
Is It Better That ten Guilty Persons Go Free Than That One Innocent Person Be Convicted?Vidar Halvorsen - 2004 - Criminal Justice Ethics 23 (2):3-13.
Terrorism, Self-Defense, and the Killing of the Innocent.Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2004 - Social Philosophy Today 20:41-52.
Compulsory Victim Restitution is Punishment: A Reply to Boonin.Michael Cholbi - 2010 - Public Reason 2 (1):85-93.
Added to index2010-11-08
Total downloads83 ( #63,769 of 2,178,189 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,497 of 2,178,189 )
How can I increase my downloads?