Policies, Regulations, and Eco-ethical Wisdom Relating to Ancient Chinese Fisheries

Abstract
Marine ecosystems are in serious troubles globally, largely due to the failures of fishery resources management. To restore and conserve fishery ecosystems, we need new and effective governance systems urgently. This research focuses on fisheries management in ancient China. We found that from 5,000 years ago till early modern era, Chinese ancestors had been constantly enthusiastic about sustainable utilization of fisheries resources and natural balance of fishery development. They developed numerous rigorous policies and regulations to guide people to act on natural laws. Being detailed and scientific, the legal systems had gained gratifying enforcement, due to official efforts and folks’ voluntary participation in resource management. In-depth analyses show that people’s consciousness of ecological conservation was derived from the edification of kinds of ancient eco-ethical wisdom, such as totemism, nature worship, Zhou Yi , Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Mohism, etc. All this Chinese classical wisdom have the same cores: “Nature and Man in One” spirit, frugality and “All things are equal” concept. The findings show that eco-ethical thinking is never inconsistent with social ethic systems, and it’s of great importance to give legal effect to usual ecological moral claims and eco-ethical requirements of the public in protecting the environment. The eco-ethical wisdom is efficient in assisting and urging people to fulfill humans’ obligation for nature. Finally, it’s believed that present world fisheries management will benefit a lot from all these ancient Chinese thoughts and practices. People are expected to make the most of the eco-ethical wisdom, strengthen fishery legislation and fully stimulate their voluntary participation in both marine fishery resources conservation and fishery cyclic economy
Keywords Fishery resources management  Policies and regulations  Ancient China  Eco-ethical wisdom  Ecological moral claims  Sustainable development
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10806-010-9288-9
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Eco-Minimalism as a Virtue.Paul Knights, David Littlewood & Dan Firth - 2011 - Environmental Ethics 33 (4):339-356.
Assessing Fisheries – Using an Ethical Matrix in a Participatory Process.Matthias Kaiser & Ellen-Marie Forsberg - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):191-200.
Toward Eco-Friendly Aesthetics.Sheila Lintott - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (1):57-76.
Wisdom in Organizations: Whence and Whither.David Rooney & Bernard McKenna - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (2):113 – 138.
On the Optimal Size of Marine Reserves.M. Bensenane, A. Moussaoui & P. Auger - 2013 - Acta Biotheoretica 61 (1):109-118.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-11-18

Total downloads

7 ( #521,636 of 2,164,654 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,012 of 2,164,654 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums