Springer Verlag (2021)

Authors
Hon-Lam Li
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Michael Campbell
Kyoto University
Abstract
This book explores and elaborates three theories of public reason, drawn from Rawlsian political liberalism, natural law theory, and Confucianism. Drawing together academics from these separate approaches, the volume explores how the three theories critique each other, as well as how each one brings its theoretical arsenal to bear on the urgent contemporary debate of medical assistance in dying. The volume is structured in two parts: an exploration of the three traditions, followed by an in-depth overview of the conceptual and historical background. In Part I, the three comprehensive opening chapters are supplemented by six dynamic chapters in dialogue with each other, each author responding to the other two traditions, and subsequently reflecting on the possible deficiencies of their own theories. The chapters in Part II cover a broad range of subjects, from an overview of the history of bioethics to the nature of autonomy and its status as a moral and political value. In its entirety, the volume provides a vibrant and exemplary collaborative resource to scholars interested in the role of public reason and its relevance in bioethical debate.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $112.84 new   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 978-3-030-61169-9   3030611698
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-61170-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bioethics and Public Reason: A Report on Ethics and Public Discourse in Spain.Adela Cortina - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (3):241.
Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk? [REVIEW]William E. Stempsey - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350.
The Mutability of Public Reason.Chad Flanders - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (2):180-205.
Rescuing Public Justification From Public Reason Liberalism.Fabian Wendt - 2019 - In Steven Wall, Peter Vallentyne & David Sobel (eds.), Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy Vol. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 39-64.
Public Reason.David Gauthier - 1995 - Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (1):19-42.
Civic Education and the Ideal of Public Reason.Krista K. Thomason - 2015 - Social Philosophy Today 31:177-182.
Public Justification Versus Public Deliberation: The Case for Divorce.Kevin Vallier - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):139-158.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-09

Total views
1 ( #1,545,157 of 2,506,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,828 of 2,506,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes