Philosophical Review 124 (1):119-152 (2015)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
We offer a new argument for the claim that there can be non-degenerate objective chance (“true randomness”) in a deterministic world. Using a formal model of the relationship between different levels of description of a system, we show how objective chance at a higher level can coexist with its absence at a lower level. Unlike previous arguments for the level-specificity of chance, our argument shows, in a precise sense, that higher-level chance does not collapse into epistemic probability, despite higher-level properties supervening on lower-level ones. We show that the distinction between objective chance and epistemic probability can be drawn, and operationalized, at every level of description. There is, therefore, not a single distinction between objective and epistemic probability, but a family of such distinctions.
|
Keywords | Chance Subjective versus objective probability Credence Determinism versus indeterminism Levels of description Emergence Compatibilism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2015 |
DOI | 10.1215/00318108-2812670 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis).J. A. Fodor - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):97-115.
View all 47 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Asymmetry, Abstraction, and Autonomy: Justifying Coarse-Graining in Statistical Mechanics.Katie Robertson - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (2):547-579.
View all 43 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Deterministic Probability: Neither Chance nor Credence.Aidan Lyon - 2011 - Synthese 182 (3):413-432.
On the Notion of Admissibility in Chance-Credence Principles: A Comment on Vranas.Gabriella Pigozzi - manuscript
The Third Way on Objective Probability: A Sceptic's Guide to Objective Chance.Carl Hoefer - 2007 - Mind 116 (463):549-596.
Two Mistakes About Credence and Chance.Ned Hall - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):93 – 111.
On What We Know About Chance.Frank Arntzenius & Ned Hall - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):171-179.
David Lewis’s Humean Theory of Objective Chance.Barry Loewer - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1115--25.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-04-24
Total views
608 ( #13,859 of 2,520,893 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #15,490 of 2,520,893 )
2013-04-24
Total views
608 ( #13,859 of 2,520,893 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #15,490 of 2,520,893 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads