Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220 (2006)

Authors
Christian List
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
Abstract
At the core of republican thought, on Philip Pettit’s account, lies the conception of freedom as non-domination, as opposed to freedom as noninterference in the liberal sense. I revisit the distinction between liberal and republican freedom and argue that republican freedom incorporates a particular rule-of-law requirement, whereas liberal freedom does not. Liberals may also endorse such a requirement, but not as part of their conception of freedom itself. I offer a formal analysis of this rule-of-law requirement and compare liberal and republican freedom on its basis. While I agree with Pettit that republican freedom has broader implications than liberal freedom, I conclude that we face a trade-off between two dimensions of freedom (scope and robustness) and that it is harder for republicans to solve that trade-off than it is for liberals. Key Words: freedom • republicanism • liberalism • noninterference • non-domination • rule of law • robustness • liberal paradox.
Keywords Republicanism  Freedom  Non-domination  Non-interference  Robustness  Rule of law
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X06064222
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Defending Laws in the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):56?83.
Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma and Republican Theory.Philip Pettit - 2003 - In James Fishkin & Peter Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford, UK: Blackwel. pp. 138-162.
Liberalism and Individual Preferences.John Craven - 1982 - Theory and Decision 14 (4):351-360.
Comment on Craven.Gary Anthony Gigliotti - 1986 - Theory and Decision 21 (1):89-95.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Freedom as Independence.Christian List & Laura Valentini - 2016 - Ethics 126 (4):1043–1074.
Freedom as Critique: Foucault Beyond Anarchism.Karsten Schubert - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (5):634-660.
Republicanism.Frank Lovett - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Slaves, Prisoners, and Republican Freedom.Fabian Wendt - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (2):175-192.
A Fault Line in Ethical Theory.Shyam Nair - 2014 - Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1):173-200.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Republicanism and Democratic Injustice.Henry S. Richardson - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.
A Note on List's Modal Logic of Republican Freedom.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):341-349.
Republican Confusion and Liberal Clarification.Melvin L. Rogers - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (7):799-824.
Liberal and Republican Conceptions of Freedom.Charles Larmore - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):96-119.
Freedom in the Market.Philip Pettit - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):131-149.
Republican Freedom, Rights, and the Coalition Problem.Keith Dowding - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):301-322.
Slaves, Prisoners, and Republican Freedom.Fabian Wendt - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (2):175-192.
Discourse Theory and Republican Freedom.Philip Pettit - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):72-95.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
362 ( #28,174 of 2,505,154 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #43,821 of 2,505,154 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes