Reliability in mathematical physics

Philosophy of Science 60 (1):1-21 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue three things: (1) that the interactionist view underlying Benacerraf's (1973) challenge to mathematical beliefs renders inexplicable the reliability of most of our beliefs in physics; (2) that examples from mathematical physics suggest that we should view reliability differently; and (3) that abstract mathematical considerations are indispensable to explanations of the reliability of our beliefs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,702

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reliability as a virtue.Robert Audi - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):43 - 54.
The Reliability of Randomized Algorithms.D. Fallis - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):255-271.
On explaining knowledge of necessity.Joel Pust - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (1):71–87.
Reliability of information on the internet: Some distinctions.Anton Vedder & Robert Wachbroit - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):211-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#255,848)

6 months
2 (#320,051)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Liston
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

References found in this work

Mathematical truth.Paul Benacerraf - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.
What is Mathematical Truth?Hilary Putnam - 1975 - In Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge University Press. pp. 60--78.
Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times.M. Kline - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):68-87.
Mathematics and reality.Stewart Shapiro - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):523-548.

View all 8 references / Add more references