Philosophy of Science 60 (1):1-21 (1993)

Authors
Michael Liston
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Abstract
In this paper I argue three things: (1) that the interactionist view underlying Benacerraf's (1973) challenge to mathematical beliefs renders inexplicable the reliability of most of our beliefs in physics; (2) that examples from mathematical physics suggest that we should view reliability differently; and (3) that abstract mathematical considerations are indispensable to explanations of the reliability of our beliefs.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289715
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Tins and Tin-Openers.Michael Liston - 2009 - In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 151--160.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reliability as a Virtue.Robert Audi - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):43 - 54.
The Reliability of Randomized Algorithms.D. Fallis - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):255-271.
On Explaining Knowledge of Necessity.Joel Pust - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (1):71–87.
Reliability of Information on the Internet: Some Distinctions.Anton Vedder & Robert Wachbroit - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):211-215.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
42 ( #260,529 of 2,463,138 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,428 of 2,463,138 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes