Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):127-139 (2007)
The debate over the use of genetically-modified (GM) crops is one where the heat to light ratio is often quite low. Both proponents and opponents of GM crops often resort more to rhetoric than argument. This paper attempts to use Philip Kitcher’s idea of a “well-ordered science” to bring coherence to the debate. While I cannot, of course, here decide when and where, if at all, GM crops should be used I do show how Kitcher’s approach provides a useful framework in which to evaluate the desirability of using GM crops. At the least Kitcher’s approach allows us to see that the current state of research in to, and use of, GM crops is very far from the ideal of a well-ordered science and gives us a goal to work towards if we wish to achieve a more well-ordered agricultural policy
|Keywords||GMO GM Crops Well-ordered science Philip Kitcher value and objectivity in science political economy of science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Well-Ordered Science: The Case of GM Crops.Matthew J. Lister - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research (Feb.):127-139.
Genuine Problems and the Significance of Science.Matthew J. Brown - 2010 - Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):131-153.
Science and the Common Good: Thoughts on Philip Kitcher's Science, Truth, and Democracy.Helen E. Longino - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):560-568.
Biomedical Research, Neglected Diseases, and Well-Ordered Science.Julian Reiss & Philip Kitcher - 2010 - Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 24 (3):263-282.
A Euthyphronic Problem for Kitcher's Epistemology of Science.Jeffrey W. Roland - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):205-223.
Disagreement, Democracy, and the Goals of Science: Is a Normative Philosophy of Science Possible, If Ethical Inquiry Is Not?Arnon Keren - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (04):525-544.
The Proper Ends of Science: Philip Kitcher, Science, and the Good.Jeremy R. Simon - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (2):194-214.
The Characterization of Epistemology in Philip Kitcher: A Critical Reflection From New Empiricism.Inmaculada Perdomo - 2012 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):113-138.
Hugh Lacey, Values and Objectivity in Science: The Current Controversy About Transgenic Crops:Values and Objectivity in Science: The Current Controversy About Transgenic Crops.Charles Blatz - 2007 - Ethics 117 (4):774-776.
From Philosophy of Science to Philosophy of Literature (and Back) Via Philosophy of Mind. Philip Kitcher’s Philosophical Pendulum.Bence Nanay - 2013 - Theoria (77):257-264.
Re-Politicising Philosophy of Science: A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology.Kei Yoshida - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):365-378.
The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions.Philip Kitcher - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads33 ( #153,987 of 2,158,886 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #193,038 of 2,158,886 )
How can I increase my downloads?