Journal of Philosophical Research (Feb.):127-139 (2007)
The proponents of competing views about the safety and usefulness of GM crops often talk past each other. One major reason for this is the lack of a shared framework in which to evaluate their competing claims. In this paper I shall make use of Philip Kitcher's idea of a well-ordered science to see if it may offer us any guidance here. In doing so I shall first lay out the idea of a well-ordered science, as developed by Kitcher. Next I will see how it might deal with at least some of the controversies surrounding GM crops. In doing so I have two main goals. First, to show that work on the development and application of GM crops is distinctly un-well ordered at this time. Secondly, I seek to show that only by applying the ideals of something like a well-ordered science can we properly asses the potential harms and benefits of GM crops. Once I have done this, I tentatively suggest that the role of GM crops in solving the problems noted above is likely to be much smaller than their proponents might have thought.
|Keywords||GMO GM Crops Philip Kitcher Well-Ordered Science value and objectivity in science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Assessing the Value of Transgenic Crops.Hugh Lacey - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):497-511.
Ethical Discourse on the Use of Genetically Modified Crops: A Review of Academic Publications in the Fields of Ecology and Environmental Ethics. [REVIEW]Daniel Gregorowius, Petra Lindemann-Matthies & Markus Huppenbauer - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):265-293.
The Variety of Lattice-Ordered Monoids Generated by the Natural Numbers.Annika M. Wille - 2004 - Studia Logica 76 (2):275 - 290.
Hugh Lacey, Values and Objectivity in Science: The Current Controversy About Transgenic Crops:Values and Objectivity in Science: The Current Controversy About Transgenic Crops.Charles Blatz - 2007 - Ethics 117 (4):774-776.
Ordered Preference Differences Without Ordered Preferences.Peter C. Fishburn - 1986 - Synthese 67 (2):361 - 368.
Commercialization of Perennial GE Crops: Looming Challenges for Regulatory Frameworks. [REVIEW]V. Bagavathiannan Muthukumar, Spök Armin & C. Van Acker Rene - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):227-242.
Ethical Considerations at the Various Stages in the Development, Production, and Consumption of GM Crops.Michael J. Reiss - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):179-190.
GM Crops: Patently Wrong? [REVIEW]James Wilson - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):261-283.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #164,746 of 2,164,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,414 of 2,164,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?