Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):295-312 (1999)

Abstract
In this article, I urge that mainstream discussions of abortion are dissatisfying in large part because they proceed in polite abstraction from the distinctive circumstances and meanings of gestation. Such discussions, in fact, apply to abortion conceptual tools that were designed on the premiss that people are physically demarcated, even as gestation is marked by a thorough-going intertwinement. We cannot fully appreciate what is normatively at stake with legally forcing continued gestation, or again how to discuss moral responsibilities to continue gestating, until we appreciate in their own terms the goods and evils distinctive of gestational connection. To underscore the need to explore further the meanings of gestation, I provide two examples of the difference it might make to legal and moral discussions of abortion if we appreciate more fully that gestation is an intimacy.
Keywords abortion  intimacy  reproduction
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1009955129773
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,138
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Were You a Part of Your Mother?Elselijn Kingma - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):609-646.
If Abortion, Then Infanticide.David B. Hershenov & Rose J. Hershenov - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (5):387-409.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
687 ( #7,806 of 2,411,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #49,335 of 2,411,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes