A Note Concerning Conciliationism and Self-Defeat: A Reply to Matheson

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2014)

Abstract

This is a reply to Jon Matheson on conciliationism and the self-defeat objection. I argue that the problems that Matheson discusses derive from his evidentialist assumptions, not from conciliationism.

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-20

Downloads
334 (#32,360)

6 months
10 (#74,047)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clayton Littlejohn
Australian Catholic University

References found in this work

Evidentialism.Richard Feldman & Earl Conee - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (1):15 - 34.
Epistemic Akrasia.Sophie Horowitz - 2014 - Noûs 48 (4):718-744.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Akratic (epistemic) modesty.David Christensen - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (7):2191-2214.

Add more citations