Philosophical Issues 31 (1):227-239 (2021)

Authors
Clayton Littlejohn
King's College London
Abstract
While many of us would not want to abandon the requirement that a defendant can only be found guilty of a serious criminal offence by a unanimous jury, we should not expect epistemology to give us the resources we need for justifying this requirement. The doubts that might prevent jurors from reaching unanimity do not show that, say, the BARD standard has not been met. Even if it were true, as some have suggested, that rationality requires that a jury composed of epistemic peers should coalesce around one view about the defendant’s guilt, the failure to reach unanimity might be a good reason to worry about the epistemic failings of some small number of jurors but no reason to worry that we’ve failed to protect the defendant from an unjustified imposition of, say, the risk against wrongful conviction. The arguments for the unanimity requirement will need to come from outside of epistemology.
Keywords Jury Unanimity  Reasonable Doubt
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phis.12197
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Accuracy and the Laws of Credence.Richard Pettigrew - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Probabilistic Knowledge.Sarah Moss - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Knowledge in a Social World.Alvin Ira Goldman - 1999 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Necessity and Jury Nullification.Travis Hreno - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (2):351-378.
Justification of Belief Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.Oren Lee Zeve - 1998 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
In the Space of Reasonable Doubt.Marion Vorms & Ulrike Hahn - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 15):3609-3633.
Waiving Jury Deliberation.Andrei Poama - 2020 - Social Theory and Practice 46 (1):181-204.
Reasonable Doubt : Uncertainty in Education, Science and Law.Tony Gardner-Medwin - 2011 - In Philip Dawid, William Twining & Mimi Vasilaki (eds.), Evidence, Inference and Enquiry. Oup/British Academy. pp. 465-483.
Parsing the Reasonable Person: The Case of Self-Defense.Andrew Ingram - 2012 - American Journal of Criminal Law 39 (3):101-120.
Reasonable Self-doubt.Ofer Malcai & Ram Rivlin - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (1):25-45.
On Agreed Actions Without Agreed Notions.Emmanuel Ifeanyi Ani - 2014 - South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):311-320.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-07-04

Total views
239 ( #46,381 of 2,506,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #14,736 of 2,506,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes