Cambridge University Press (2012)

Authors
Clayton Littlejohn
King's College London
Abstract
The internalism-externalism debate is one of the oldest debates in epistemology. Internalists assert that the justification of our beliefs can only depend on facts internal to us, while externalists insist that justification can depend on additional, for example environmental, factors. Clayton Littlejohn proposes and defends a new strategy for resolving this debate. Focussing on the connections between practical and theoretical reason, he explores the question of whether the priority of the good to the right might be used to defend an epistemological version of consequentialism, and proceeds to formulate a new 'deontological externalist' view. On this view, the justificatory status of a belief depends upon whether it is fit for the purposes of practical reasoning. Only beliefs that meet externalist standards are fit for such a purpose. If we want to understand how a wide range of norms (e.g., moral norms) apply to rational agents regardless of what their evidence or outlook is like, we have to embrace an externalist account of the justification.
Keywords Justification (Theory of knowledge  Knowledge, Theory of  Morally Loaded Cases
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
Buy this book $34.96 used (21% off)   $43.71 new (1% off)   $43.99 from Amazon    Amazon page
Call number BD212.L58 2012
ISBN(s) 9781107414662   9781139512350   1107414660   1107016126
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,219
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence.Alex Worsnip - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1):3-44.
Stop Making Sense? On a Puzzle About Rationality.Littlejohn Clayton - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research:257-272.
Dilemmic Epistemology.Nick Hughes - 2019 - Synthese 196 (10):4059-4090.
A Puzzle About Epistemic Akrasia.Daniel Greco - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):201-219.
What is Good Reasoning?Conor McHugh & Jonathan Way - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research:153-174.

View all 164 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does Justification Aim at Truth?Peter J. Graham - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):51-72.
Chisholm's Internalism and Its Consequences.Richard Feldman - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):603-620.
Is Justification Dialectical?Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (3):182-201.
The Chimerical Appeal of Epistemic Externalism.Joe Cruz & John Pollock - 2004 - In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter. pp. 125--42.
Deontology and Defeat.Michael Bergmann - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
The Indispensibility of Internalism in Epistemology.Fatih S. M. Ozturk - 2004 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
A Defense of Deontological Externalism.David Dean Reiter - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Epistemic Internalism.Bjc Madison - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (10):840-853.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-04-24

Total views
116 ( #92,048 of 2,448,389 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #53,950 of 2,448,389 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes