The Externalist’s Demon

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):399-434 (2009)

Authors
Clayton Littlejohn
King's College London
Abstract
In this paper, I defend externalist accounts of justified belief from Cohen's new evil demon objection. While I think that Cohen might be right that the person is justified in believing what she does, I argue that this is because we can defend the person from criticism and that defending a person is a very different thing from defending a person's attitudes or actions. To defend a person's attitudes or actions, we need to show that they met standards or did not violate norms. Intuitions about whether we can defend a person from criticism are a poor guide when it comes to determining whether norms were violated or standards were met. It turns out that even radical forms of externalism about justification are compatible with the intuitions that Cohen's example elicits. Properly understood, those intuitions show that the believer should be excused from criticism (and excused for failing to believe with adequate justification).
Keywords New Evil Demon Problem  Reliabilism  Personal Justification  Justification and Excuse  Enkratic Requirement  Epistemic Excuses
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI cjphil200939317
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Justified Belief.Alvin Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.
Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.
How to Be a Fallibilist.Stewart Cohen - 1988 - Philosophical Perspectives 2:91-123.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Deontology and Descartes’s Demon.Brian Weatherson - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (9):540-569.
XV—The Russellian Retreat.Clayton Littlejohn - 2013 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (3pt3):293-320.
The Composite Nature of Epistemic Justification.Paul Silva Jr - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (1).

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The New Evil Demon Problem.Clayton Littlejohn - unknown - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Plea for Epistemic Excuses.Clayton Littlejohn - forthcoming - In Fabian Dorsch Julien Dutant (ed.), The New Evil Demon Problem. Oxford University Press.
The Debasing Demon.J. Schaffer - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):228-237.
A New Response to the New Evil Demon Problem.Umut Baysan - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (1):41-45.
Demons in Physics. [REVIEW]Amit Hagar - 2014 - Metascience 23 (2):1-10.
Schaffer's Demon.Nathan Ballantyne & Ian Evans - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (4):552-559.
Zlotřilý démon vítězný?Jan Palkoska - 2003 - Filosoficky Casopis 51:765-785.
The Basing Relation and the Impossibility of the Debasing Demon.Patrick Bondy & J. Adam Carter - forthcoming - American Philosophical Quarterly 55 (3):203-216.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-04-03

Total views
923 ( #2,978 of 2,266,403 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #12,535 of 2,266,403 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature